Difference between revisions of "Talk:Example Ship Page"

From Starsonata Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New section: -- ~~~~)
(Discussion?)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
 
Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
  
== -- [[User:71.36.6.121|71.36.6.121]] 20:27, 9 February 2008 (PST) ==
+
==Disorganized looking?==
  
 
Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?
 
Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?

Revision as of 00:28, 10 February 2008

Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --209.66.18.104 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT)

Aparently... because its half the tech of the ship rounded up.... -Simon 15:49, 23 August 2007 (PDT)


Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)

Disorganized looking?

Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?