Difference between revisions of "Talk:Example Ship Page"
From Starsonata Wiki
(Discussion?) |
(→Disorganized looking?) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think? | Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Re: Disorganized looking? -- [[User:Simon|Simon]] 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)=== | ||
| + | This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form. | ||
Revision as of 16:31, 10 February 2008
Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --209.66.18.104 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- Aparently... because its half the tech of the ship rounded up.... -Simon 15:49, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
Disorganized looking?
Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?
Re: Disorganized looking? -- Simon 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)
This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form.
