Difference between revisions of "Talk:Augmenters"

Revision as of 12:15, 10 April 2008

The god augs should be broken up into sub-pages perhaps? Admin 08:00, 3 July 2006 (PDT)

Nice work!

I love what you've done with the place. Good job! ArrowHate 20:36, 5 July 2006 (PDT)

Expertise Aug

There's a tech20 Fighter Ace Spec ? Can anyone confirm this exists ? And are there any other tech20 secondary-skill augs(as opposed to teriarty-skill) ?

Adding all the updates to augmenter sizes that I can verify.... Thanar 18:19, 5 October 2006 (PDT)

I know ther is a Bezerker Spec from the test server, I beleive there was Fighter Ace and other such skills. I have no other information, sorry, hope that helps.
~Necros

Tech level

Could someone explain what the augs tech level means?

The tech of the aug cannot exceed the tech of the ship it is being equipped to. --Nuro 20:10, 9 April 2007 (PDT)

Calypso Aug

Shouldn't the Calypso Aug be classified as a God Aug, and thus be placed in the God Aug section rather than Uncommon section? It drops from AI that drop God augs and it has a + version like a god aug, as well as can be used in the God Aug missions for the Acropolis. --Nuro 20:10, 9 April 2007 (PDT)

Re: Calypso Aug -- Kles 16:39, 9 April 2008 (PDT)

I agree exactly 1 year later FTW. I think it is a god aug, even in the Acropolis as stated above. It shall be moved I say! Opinions? --Kles 16:40, 9 April 2008 (PDT)

Re: Re: Calypso Aug -- Thaj 22:07, 9 April 2008 (PDT)

Yes Calypso aug should be moved to god augs. After all .. Calypso IS god in greek mythology like rest of them. Btw: I wonder if player Calypso knows that in greek mythology Calypso was daughter of Atlas and held Odysseus as prisoner for "certain activities" .. :)

Re: Re: Re: Calypso Aug -- Simon 10:15, 10 April 2008 (PDT)

The only reason i think it was not originally in the god augs section is that it was not one of the original god augs. It was put in the game after Caly won emp. It is akin to the alby aug in that it is an aug specifically designed to be used in building a specific ship. Now tho it has a + version like all the other god augs so i suppose it can be moved.

Stats

It might be a good idea to wait on aug stats. Alot of stats are going to be changed due to beefing of normal augs.

spacey/speedy -- Simon 21:07, 10 February 2008 (PST)

are they actually 1 tech higher than the normal counterparts? i cant check cuz im not playing, but i dont recall it being that way. It was just that way for the combination augs like minor monkey or basic racer as far as i know.

Subsection -- Ingendum 15:36, 24 March 2008 (PDT)

What about making a subsection for the new AI augs? Will get pretty messy if the uncommon aug section is huge

Re: Subsection -- Thaj 00:47, 25 March 2008 (PDT)

I was thinking about same thing. I can do it later today, if someone else doesn't "outwiki" me. :)

I personally think its better to keep them in the Uncommon aug section: even if they are ship-specific, thats pretty much what the uncommon section is anyway -- ship specific and mission augs. Oh, and why is this being redirected to new old augmenters talk page? --Nuro 13:35, 25 March 2008 (PDT)

Why is the new pax aug in the wrong section? -- Comet Chaser 11:30, 26 March 2008 (PDT)

As it says on the tin - CC

I personally don't really like the separation anyway. Some augs both drop from AI and are obtained via missions, and it just seems unnecessary to separate them when the comment column already states the source. --Nuro 13:30, 26 March 2008 (PDT)

forgot to move it, but i am thinking about moving them all back, cuz nuro makes a good point. -Simon 04:10, 27 March 2008 (PDT)

Some Aug Jargon -- Thaj 01:47, 7 April 2008 (PDT)

Can someone verify that ship mastery stats are correct? They make very little sense that way. Tech 15 is far better than tech 18. I mean if only difference is size and weight?!?!?! Same with 0-1, 3-6, 8-10, 11-14, 19-20.

Another thing: I would like to change Acropolis God augs, Combined Augs, Skill augs, Build-in, Platform, UZ augs to follow same table format style than for an example normal God Augs? Of course Common and Base augs can stay as they are. Any objections? After this we could discuss about combining some of the tables because me and some others seem to think that there are too many of these tables. :)

Yes, the shipmaster stats are correct, they are just silly, i put every one of em in and from looking at the aug. Also all the augs that don't have the pretty format are leftover from before i started making the nice format. feel free to change them over to the new table format. Now, discuss what merges you would like to see. -Simon 06:46, 7 April 2008 (PDT)

Re: Some Aug Jargon -- Thaj 06:48, 8 April 2008 (PDT)

OK.. My major overhaul with tables is now complete. I hope peeps like it. To me personally, it makes the page much more readable. Stay tuned for my combination proposals.. :)