Difference between revisions of "Talk:Example Ship Page"
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Ship slots== | ||
Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --209.66.18.104 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT) | Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --209.66.18.104 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT) | Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Disorganized looking?== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Re: Disorganized looking? -- [[User:Simon|Simon]] 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)=== | ||
| + | This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == This should be changed, and color. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This page should be changed to the current one. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Additionally, what colors are available for the text? nothing would work for me for some reason, which makes some of the brighter background colors impractical. | ||
| + | :[http://qed.princeton.edu/index.php/MediaWiki:Color_Names have a look at the colors] -[[Image:Simon Game.gif|20px]][[User:Simon|Simon]] <small>[[User talk:Simon|''talk'']]</small> 15:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Delete/Redirect == | ||
| + | The page is currently out-of-date and existing ship pages already provide an example. This could be deleted, redirect to a good ship page, or have an existing good ship page's code copied here as the example. -[[User:Nuromishi|Nuromishi]] 17:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:08, 31 December 2010
Contents
Ship slots
Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --209.66.18.104 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- Aparently... because its half the tech of the ship rounded up.... -Simon 15:49, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
Disorganized looking?
Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?
Re: Disorganized looking? -- Simon 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)
This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form.
This should be changed, and color.
This page should be changed to the current one.
Additionally, what colors are available for the text? nothing would work for me for some reason, which makes some of the brighter background colors impractical.
- have a look at the colors -
Simon talk 15:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete/Redirect
The page is currently out-of-date and existing ship pages already provide an example. This could be deleted, redirect to a good ship page, or have an existing good ship page's code copied here as the example. -Nuromishi 17:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
