Difference between revisions of "Talk:Example Ship Page"
From Starsonata Wiki
(New section: -- ~~~~) |
(Discussion?) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT) | Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
− | == | + | ==Disorganized looking?== |
Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think? | Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think? |
Revision as of 23:28, 9 February 2008
Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --209.66.18.104 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
- Aparently... because its half the tech of the ship rounded up.... -Simon 15:49, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
Disorganized looking?
Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?