Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shields"
From Starsonata Wiki
(→resorting) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:Agreed. I personally think it would work fine like that for all item groups as long as you keep a standard system of entering the data so, for example, sources group together when grouping by a source tab which could be added, etc. --[[User:Nuro|Nuro]] 08:36, 29 March 2008 (PDT) | :Agreed. I personally think it would work fine like that for all item groups as long as you keep a standard system of entering the data so, for example, sources group together when grouping by a source tab which could be added, etc. --[[User:Nuro|Nuro]] 08:36, 29 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
::yeh, thats how i have it on my spreadsheet so that they group well when i sort. ok, i will redo it then soon. -[[User:Simon|Simon]] 18:38, 29 March 2008 (PDT) | ::yeh, thats how i have it on my spreadsheet so that they group well when i sort. ok, i will redo it then soon. -[[User:Simon|Simon]] 18:38, 29 March 2008 (PDT) | ||
| + | : I personally don't like the new grouping, looks messy and crowded. I do agree with the fact that some of the groups were unnecessary like blockade shields. The seperating of traveling shields and normal shields should stay, as well as a seperation between t0-10 and t11-20 shields. [[User:Ingendum|Ingendum]] 06:58, 2 April 2008 (PDT) | ||
===Re: resorting -- [[User:Thaj|Thaj]] 11:50, 1 April 2008 (PDT)=== | ===Re: resorting -- [[User:Thaj|Thaj]] 11:50, 1 April 2008 (PDT)=== | ||
Is there a way to "anchor" those intermediate headings to their position? Since they are after 15 or so items, then one uses sort function. The sort function will put them together. (And that messes up the whole table). Try it.. you know what mean.. :) | Is there a way to "anchor" those intermediate headings to their position? Since they are after 15 or so items, then one uses sort function. The sort function will put them together. (And that messes up the whole table). Try it.. you know what mean.. :) | ||
:Yeh, i made it so they got flung to the bottom because i dont think there is an achoring tag. I figured it would be better than having them sort with the rest of the table, somehow one of them still rises to the top tho... -[[User:Simon|Simon]] 19:44, 1 April 2008 (PDT) | :Yeh, i made it so they got flung to the bottom because i dont think there is an achoring tag. I figured it would be better than having them sort with the rest of the table, somehow one of them still rises to the top tho... -[[User:Simon|Simon]] 19:44, 1 April 2008 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:58, 2 April 2008
Add the juju embada and the t20 juju shield to the "low vis" section, my acc isn't paid atm or I'd post stats, ask Junkie. ~Necros
Contents
headings
some headings are broken, should be fixed. Like slow shields/high regen shields
-- Simon 15:19, 9 March 2008 (PDT)
hey nuro, whats the description on unt faranji trekker?
undead spacerat shield -- 72.18.100.4 09:47, 16 March 2008 (PDT)
whats the reg and bank on the undead spacerat shield?
- I think its a deadstop. -Simon 11:21, 16 March 2008 (PDT)
helium wall -- 72.18.100.4 14:04, 17 March 2008 (PDT)
you messd he heallum wall bank is 3600 and i doint know reg you buy it in lavanite.
resorting -- Simon 07:08, 29 March 2008 (PDT)
i feel that the different groups are unnecessary with the sortable tables function now working, if i dont get complaints i'm gonna switch it to defaulted sort by tech. Any other information can simply be sorted out with the sort function. It's much easier to edit this way.
- Agreed. I personally think it would work fine like that for all item groups as long as you keep a standard system of entering the data so, for example, sources group together when grouping by a source tab which could be added, etc. --Nuro 08:36, 29 March 2008 (PDT)
- yeh, thats how i have it on my spreadsheet so that they group well when i sort. ok, i will redo it then soon. -Simon 18:38, 29 March 2008 (PDT)
- I personally don't like the new grouping, looks messy and crowded. I do agree with the fact that some of the groups were unnecessary like blockade shields. The seperating of traveling shields and normal shields should stay, as well as a seperation between t0-10 and t11-20 shields. Ingendum 06:58, 2 April 2008 (PDT)
Re: resorting -- Thaj 11:50, 1 April 2008 (PDT)
Is there a way to "anchor" those intermediate headings to their position? Since they are after 15 or so items, then one uses sort function. The sort function will put them together. (And that messes up the whole table). Try it.. you know what mean.. :)
- Yeh, i made it so they got flung to the bottom because i dont think there is an achoring tag. I figured it would be better than having them sort with the rest of the table, somehow one of them still rises to the top tho... -Simon 19:44, 1 April 2008 (PDT)
