Difference between revisions of "Talk:Example Ship Page"

From Starsonata Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (7 revisions)
(This should be changed, and color.: new section)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
===Re: Disorganized looking? -- [[User:Simon|Simon]] 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)===
 
===Re: Disorganized looking? -- [[User:Simon|Simon]] 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)===
 
This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form.
 
This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form.
 +
 +
== This should be changed, and color. ==
 +
 +
This page should be changed to the current one.
 +
 +
Additionally, what colors are available for the text? nothing would work for me for some reason, which makes some of the brighter background colors impractical.

Revision as of 02:50, 11 March 2009

Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --209.66.18.104 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT)

Aparently... because its half the tech of the ship rounded up.... -Simon 15:49, 23 August 2007 (PDT)


Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)

Disorganized looking?

Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?

Re: Disorganized looking? -- Simon 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)

This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form.

This should be changed, and color.

This page should be changed to the current one.

Additionally, what colors are available for the text? nothing would work for me for some reason, which makes some of the brighter background colors impractical.